The platform

Autonomous penetration testing,
with the controls a real production environment requires.

An AI agent runs end-to-end penetration tests across your whole environment — internet-facing systems, web apps and APIs, cloud (AWS/GCP/Azure), hybrid setups, and internal networks. Your team can approve, override, or take over at any point. Every test ships with a live portal, a programmatic API, and the formal report your organization needs.

The engagement model

Each test is scoped to a defined target and timeframe. You commission the test; the AI agent executes it within the agreed scope and operator mode. The portal and API are live from kickoff onward and remain available for your audit window. The formal report ships at completion. Because the agent runs faster than a comparable human team, retesting and follow-on tests are economical to schedule as part of an ongoing remediation cycle.

How an engagement runs

Six phases, each traceable in the portal.

Aligned with PTES — the Penetration Testing Execution Standard, the industry’s standard methodology for how a pentest is structured. Pre-engagement scoping work happens before kickoff; see Engagement Process for that.

01

Reconnaissance

Outside-in intelligence gathering: passive discovery of exposed services, subdomains, public infrastructure, leaked credentials, and identity sources. Observations appear in the portal with full provenance as they are collected.

02

Discovery & Enumeration

Active probing of the surface that reconnaissance produced: open-port discovery, service fingerprinting, version detection, share and account enumeration, web-application surface mapping. Each enumerated asset feeds the vulnerability-assessment phase.

03

Vulnerability Assessment

Each enumerated asset is evaluated against the technique library and the known-vulnerability corpus. Findings are produced for any condition that maps to a real exploitation path, classified by severity, CVSS score, and MITRE / OWASP coverage.

04

Exploitation

The agent attempts the techniques that vulnerability assessment surfaced. Successful exploits land in the portal as findings with the exact command, response, and captured artifacts that demonstrate the access achieved.

05

Post-Exploitation

From the established foothold: lateral movement, privilege escalation, persistence assessment, and impact demonstration. Trust chains traversed and credential paths walked are recorded in the attack-path view as confirmed hops.

06

Reporting

The executive summary and detailed technical report are generated from the same evidence the portal displays. Findings, attack path, MITRE coverage, and compliance impact compose into the formal engagement deliverable.

Customer portal — Phases view showing six PTES-aligned phases from Reconnaissance through Reporting, with the currently active phase highlighted
Portal · Phases
Coverage

The full attack surface, covered.

Most agentic pentest tools focus on a narrow slice: build pipelines, source repositories, or public web alone. Useful for spot-checks, but not a substitute for a penetration test that covers your whole environment.

Our platform covers the same surfaces a human-led pentest is expected to cover, with techniques selected and adapted to each environment.

External

Internet-facing perimeter assessments: exposed services, public web and API endpoints, mail and DNS infrastructure, leaked credentials, and identity-surface enumeration.

Web application & API

Authenticated and unauthenticated testing across web applications and REST/GraphQL APIs. OWASP-class issues, business-logic flaws, authorization model defects, and API-specific misconfiguration.

Cloud

AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure environments. IAM and role-chain abuse, exposed storage, compute and container compromise, serverless execution, and cross-account trust exploitation.

Hybrid

Mixed on-premises and cloud environments where lateral movement, identity federation, and trust chains cross network and provider boundaries.

Internal & Active Directory

Assumed-breach and internal network engagements. Kerberos abuse, credential dumping, ACL and delegation exploitation, lateral movement, and domain or forest escalation.

Targeted scope

Engagements scoped to specific assets, business units, or compliance boundaries. The agent operates strictly inside the perimeter your engagement agreement authorizes.

Operator control

You choose how the agent runs.

Most agentic penetration testing tools have one setting: fully autonomous, with the customer watching from the sidelines. That’s fine for some tests, a non-starter for others. Live customer systems, regulated environments, and change-controlled organizations all demand human oversight on what the agent does.

Our platform offers the full operator spectrum on every test, and you can switch between modes mid-test — start fully autonomous, move down to review-before-exploitation when the test enters sensitive territory, and take manual control on the specific steps that warrant it.

Mode 01

Fully Autonomous

The agent executes the engagement end-to-end within the agreed scope, with no operator intervention required. Suitable for re-runs against known environments, regression testing after remediation, or first-pass engagements where the customer wants the agent to operate freely within its guardrails.

Mode 02

Review before exploitation

The agent enumerates, identifies attack paths, and queues exploitation steps — but pauses for operator approval before executing actions that affect the target. Your team approves, modifies, or declines each step. Useful when production sensitivity, regulated environments, or change-control requirements demand explicit oversight.

Mode 03

Manual with agent-assisted guidance

A human operator from your team or ours drives techniques directly through the platform, with the agent suggesting next steps, providing tooling, and recording evidence. Use it for novel surfaces or sensitive systems where you want a human in the driver's seat with the agent acting as a force multiplier.

Portal · 01

Asset Inventory

Every host the agent has touched, classified.

The Asset Inventory view shows every host the agent has discovered or tested, classified by role and compromise state. Filter by role or state, search by host, and click through to the findings tied to each asset.

Customer portal — Asset Inventory view showing hosts by role and compromise state
Portal · Asset Inventory

Role classification

Domain Controller, Database, Hypervisor, Web Server, File Server, Workstation, generic Host.

Compromise state

Compromised, Foothold, Enumerated, Untouched — color-coded across the inventory.

Per-host findings

Severity-bucketed finding counts on every row, one click to the detail view.

Portal · 02

Findings

Every finding, the moment it lands.

Findings show up in real time as the agent identifies them — severity-classified, CVSS-scored, and tied to the engagement phase that produced them. Each finding carries its evidence: the commands run, the responses captured, the affected hosts, the technique used.

Customer portal — Findings list showing critical, high, and post-exploitation findings
Portal · Findings

Severity & CVSS

Each finding labeled with severity tier, CVSS 3.1 score, and CWE / OWASP mapping.

Engagement-phase tag

Findings labeled by phase (Reconnaissance, Discovery & Enumeration, Vulnerability Assessment, Exploitation, Post-Exploitation).

Assignment & retest

Assign to a team member, capture remediation notes, retest from the same view.

Portal · 03

Demonstrated Attack Graph

Every traversal, mapped.

The Demonstrated Attack Graph view shows the trust and credential paths from the operator’s foothold to your tier-0 assets (your highest-value targets like Domain Admin). Each edge is a confirmed traversal. Click any node to inspect details; hover an edge to see the technique used.

Customer portal — Demonstrated Attack Graph showing the chain that produced Domain Admin
Portal · Demonstrated Attack Graph

Confirmed traversals

Edges are recorded only when the agent has confirmed the pivot — no theoretical paths.

Node inspector

Click any node to see kind, state, posture, open ports, and tied findings.

Tier-0 reach indicator

Top-of-graph badge showing whether Domain Admin or equivalent tier-0 was reached.

Portal · 04

Executive Summary

The answer to "how far did the attacker get?"

The Executive Summary view distills the engagement into the format you would hand to stakeholders, auditors, or customer-assurance teams: assessment narrative, demonstrated business impact, and compliance impact aligned to the frameworks your organization reports against.

Customer portal — Executive Summary showing demonstrated business impact and compliance impact
Portal · Executive Summary

Assessment narrative

Operator-authored summary of what the engagement found, in plain English.

Business impact

Demonstrated impact written against assets and outcomes that matter to the organization.

Compliance impact

Findings mapped to NIST 800-53, PCI DSS, ISO, SOC 2, and HIPAA where applicable.

Portal · 05

Reports

Formal deliverables, generated on demand.

Generate and download the formal engagement deliverables whenever you need them. Executive summary and detailed technical report ship as polished PDFs; the same content is also available as Markdown and as structured JSON for ingestion into your own documentation, SIEM, or GRC pipelines.

REPORTS
6 deliverables · 4 reports · 2 exports · last regenerated 1h ago
Reports
Generate, download, and version the formal engagement deliverables. Reports are produced from the same evidence the portal displays — auditor and workspace stay in sync.
PDF
Executive Summary
STAKEHOLDER REPORT
• READY
High-level engagement summary for executive stakeholders and customer-assurance teams.
LAST EVENT
2d ago
SIZE
14 pages
INCLUDES Engagement outcome · Business impact · Compliance impact
v3
PDF
Technical Detail
TECHNICAL REPORT
• READY
Full per-finding technical writeup with reproduction steps, evidence, and remediation guidance.
LAST EVENT
2d ago
SIZE
78 pages
INCLUDES Findings · Evidence · Remediation guidance
v3
PDF
Compliance Mapping
COMPLIANCE REPORT
• READY
Findings mapped to NIST 800-53, PCI DSS, ISO 27001, SOC 2, and HIPAA controls.
LAST EVENT
2d ago
SIZE
6 pages
INCLUDES NIST 800-53 · PCI DSS · ISO 27001 · SOC 2 · HIPAA
v3
ZIP
Engagement Evidence
EVIDENCE ARCHIVE
• READY
Raw evidence artifacts: commands, responses, captures, screenshots indexed by finding.
LAST EVENT
1h ago
SIZE
142 files
INCLUDES Commands · Responses · Screenshots
v3
JSON
Findings Export
MACHINE-READABLE
• READY
Findings, evidence references, MITRE/OWASP coverage, and engagement metadata as structured JSON.
LAST EVENT
1h ago
SIZE
58 findings
CONTAINS Findings · Evidence refs · MITRE/OWASP mapping
v12
MD
Markdown Export
MACHINE-READABLE
• READY
Full report content as Markdown for ingestion into your internal documentation systems.
LAST EVENT
1h ago
SIZE
92 KB
CONTAINS Report content · Structured headings · Inline evidence links
v12
Portal · Reports (mock)

PDF deliverables

Executive summary, technical report, and compliance mapping as audit-grade PDFs.

Versioned

Every regeneration is saved as a versioned snapshot; previous versions remain downloadable.

Machine-readable

Findings, evidence, and engagement metadata exportable as JSON or Markdown.

Portal · 06

Integrations

Connect the engagement to the systems your team already uses.

Push findings to your ticketing system. Stream engagement events to your incident-response channel. Configured once at the organization level; applied to every engagement going forward.

Customer portal — Integrations view showing Jira Cloud, ServiceNow ITSM, and Slack integrations with health status
Portal · Integrations

Ticketing

Jira Cloud and ServiceNow ITSM for finding → ticket sync with full evidence linked. More tracker integrations on the roadmap.

Chat

Slack channels for real-time alerts on critical findings, new C2 sessions, and detection gaps.

Health & volume

Per-integration health, last-event timestamp, and 24-hour volume visible from a single config view.

Coverage frameworks

Coverage, mapped automatically.

Every technique the agent exercises is recorded against MITRE ATT&CK and OWASP — the two industry-standard catalogs of attacker behavior and application security risks. Each technique gets one of three states: Confirmed (executed and demonstrated), Attempted (tried but unsuccessful), or Observed (recognized as present but not exercised). All auditable, exportable, and comparable across tests.

TA0043
Reconnaissance
T1595
Active Scanning
T1590
Network Info
T1589
Identity Info
T1593
Open Websites
T1596
Open Tech DBs
TA0001
Initial Access
T1078
Valid Accounts
T1190
Exploit Public App
T1566
Phishing
T1133
External Services
T1199
Trusted Relationship
TA0002
Execution
T1059
CLI Interpreter
T1053
Scheduled Task
T1569
System Services
T1648
Serverless Exec
T1651
Cloud Admin Cmd
TA0003
Persistence
T1098
Account Manip
T1136
Create Account
T1505
Server Software
T1546
Event Triggered
T1547
Boot/Logon Autostart
TA0008
Lateral Movement
T1021
Remote Services
T1080
Taint Shared Content
T1550
Use Alt Auth Material
T1563
Remote Service Session
T1570
Lateral Tool Transfer
TA0010
Exfiltration
T1041
C2 Channel
T1567
Web Service
T1048
Alt Protocol
T1029
Scheduled Transfer
T1537
Cloud Storage
ConfirmedAttemptedObserved
OWASP Top 10 · Web (2021)
A01
Broken Access Control
A02
Cryptographic Failures
A03
Injection
A04
Insecure Design
A05
Security Misconfiguration
A06
Vulnerable & Outdated Components
A07
Identification & Auth Failures
A08
Software & Data Integrity Failures
A09
Security Logging & Monitoring
A10
Server-Side Request Forgery
OWASP API Top 10 (2023)
API1
Broken Object Level Authorization
API2
Broken Authentication
API3
Broken Object Property Level Authz
API4
Unrestricted Resource Consumption
API5
Broken Function Level Authorization
API6
Unrestricted Access to Sensitive Flows
API7
Server Side Request Forgery
API8
Security Misconfiguration
API9
Improper Inventory Management
API10
Unsafe Consumption of APIs
Confirmed Attempted Observed
API

Engagement data, available to your systems.

A documented REST API for programmatic access to your test data, operator-mode transitions, and the same actions your team takes through the portal.

Programmatic access to engagement data

Findings, evidence, MITRE and OWASP coverage, attack-path graph data, and engagement metadata are exposed via a documented REST API. Suitable for ingestion into a security data lake, internal reporting tooling, or downstream automation.

Automate retest cycles

Schedule retests programmatically when remediation lands in your environment — for example, from a CI hook, a deployment pipeline, or a change-management workflow — and consume the validation result in the same automation.

Drive operator modes from your tooling

Initiate engagements, switch between operator modes, approve queued exploitation steps, and surface engagement state into your team’s existing dashboards or paging systems.

Integrate with your stack

Wire engagement data into SIEM, GRC, ticketing, and notification systems at the level of granularity your team requires.

Agent capabilities and oversight

What the agent does

  • Plans the engagement against the agreed scope, selecting which surfaces to enumerate and which techniques to attempt.
  • Adapts technique selection based on the state of the engagement; reconnaissance results inform initial-access attempts; successful access shapes lateral movement.
  • Collects evidence — commands, responses, screenshots, artifact captures — and ties each to the technique that produced it.
  • Maps the attack path and assigns MITRE ATT&CK and OWASP coverage as the engagement progresses.
  • Runs in whichever operator mode the test is configured for. Yields to human approval or direct control as required.

Boundaries and oversight

  • The agent operates strictly inside the scope authorized in the engagement agreement, with hard guardrails on out-of-scope assets.
  • High-impact actions gate on human approval when the engagement is configured for review-before-exploitation, and are never executed unattended in production-sensitive contexts.
  • Engagement reports distinguish actions executed autonomously from steps reviewed or driven by an operator, so the audit trail is complete.
  • The platform supplements your security team. Response and remediation remain owned by your organization.

See the platform on a representative engagement.

A walkthrough of a complete test — portal, API, operator modes, and report — against a staged environment. About thirty minutes.